Welcome to Egret

Welcome Back.

Member Login

Lost your password?

Registration is closed

Sorry, you are not allowed to register by yourself on this site!

Posts Tagged ‘Recruiting’



The Buzz- November 2011

Giving Thanks.

 

It’s been a tough 4 years for the US economy. Unemployment is still dragging the overall economy down; if people don’t have jobs, they can’t buy homes or can’t afford to pay the mortgage on homes; plus they consume unemployment benefits and don’t pay taxes. It’s a morass, which takes time and political resolve to fix. Sadly, political resolve is similarly dragging the overall economy. But then there are the 92% of Americans who have jobs, who are paying taxes and mostly paying their mortgages.

The employed represent an interesting transitional challenge for all employers over the next couple of years. 50% of working Americans will be eligible to retire next year. 50%. That’s a LOT of people. This includes everyone who is on a formal pension plan: unions, government, military, etc. Therefore, eligible to retire doesn’t necessarily mean leaving the work force. As an example, both GE and Philips have early retirement programs that subtly push out their most tenured baby boomer managers. But many of these baby boomers will begin to enter an extended ‘peri-retirement’ period of their lives. Most baby boomers don’t want to fully retire; and most baby boomers don’t want to fully work, either. So balancing the boomers’ expectations of quasi-employment, with the needs to be fully staffed will represent an interesting management challenge to the Gen X’rs who are anxious to push the boomers into rocking chairs.

At the same time, 53% of employees claim to be ‘burnt-out’ and 44% of employees are either receptive to leaving or ready to leave their current employer. Employee engagement levels hover around 33%, with ‘almost engaged’ at 24%. The combination of those numbers is roughly equivalent to levels in 2008; but still represents a pool of employees that are disengaged or largely going through the motions of 43% of the employee base. The engagement levels are highly correlated with age, with Boomers 36% engaged and GenY’s 23% engaged.

What’s this all mean? It means that the War for Talent, which is here and growing daily will be uniquely shaped by quality of life issues that we’ve never faced before. Management of engaged part-time producers seems illogical; but it’ll become far more commonplace over the next ten years. The ability to retain employees will largely be a complex mix of offering challenging assignments and quality work environments with flexible hours and variable vacation benefits. Keeping talent will require some managers to simply say ‘thank you’ for being here; others may be far more challenged to provide enough interest to keep tenured employees.

Attracting new talent will also bring new approaches. ‘Filling a job opening’ will give way to creating an enticing opportunity to unique talent that may not be actively looking. The need for professional recruitment practices will grow and won’t be marginalized by internal recruiting departments that are largely charged with ‘filling openings’. Recruited talent is markedly different than applicant talent. The techniques, interviewing process and approach to attracting are profoundly different. Yet, most companies treat recruited talent like applicants and lose them before the offer stage.

Currently, US companies experience an average turn-over of employment of 13%/yr. That means that a company would need to hire 100% of its current employment every 5.5 yrs. There has to be a better way to attract and retain talent and to keep them actively engaged in the business. Companies with the highest levels of engagement report 19% higher average earnings than companies that have average engagement levels. In companies with low-engagement scores, their earnings are 44% below average. There’s something to attracting and retaining talent who is engaged in the business. It starts with recognizing that talent within your own company and developing a process to retain them. Quality talent attracts additional quality talent. The trick is to recognize how to identify quality talent; yours and others.

It’s been a remarkable year for us. We’ve hit our second largest revenue in our history and have a large backlog into next year. We’re actively interviewing and hiring for our own office and feel very bullish on 2012 and beyond. The numbers are strongly aligned behind us: the retirement of Boomers, the alienation of disaffected quality talent and the need for our client companies to meet the demands of adapting to the rush of technology into a traditionally staid industry. We’re excited for the future and we’re also very thankful for the trust of our clients and candidates.

It’s that time of year when collectively as a nation we say ‘thanks’.

To all who read this… thank you.

The trouble with recruiting…

Interesting article in the Wall Street Journal online:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204422404576596630897409182.html?mod=wsj_share_in_bot

The Buzz-December 2010

 December 2010
Volume 11 Issue 12

References, Job-hoppers and Talent shortage
by Ted Konnerth


We’ve conducted roughly 70,000 interviews over the past 11+ years. We’ve successfully placed over 500 new employees and we’ve weathered two deep recessions, so we feel pretty good about our track record. Nationally, “WE” are facing a talent and hiring condition that has never been faced before. Despite the daily dirge of bad news about unemployment, let me give a few other statistics:

  • The average tenure of a new employee is 34 months (and that includes CEO’s)
  • The unemployment rate for college graduates is 3.8%
  • The predicted number of jobs for Gen Y employees is 8 jobs before they’re 40 years old
  • Reference recommendations correlate to performance at a value of 0.29 (which in statistic-speak means the predictability is less than 9%)
  • Over 35% of resumes are fraudulent, over 75% have mistakes or ‘little white lies’
  • The level of open job postings has hit a record high level

Most companies don’t believe there is a talent shortage. With 9.8% unemployment it’s easy to assume your next engineer, branch manager, marketing director or operations manager is sitting outside your door with his/her resume in hand and the desire to go to work on Monday at a 25% discount in compensation. If only it were true.

The talent pool is very thin right now. We only work in this industry so our view is limited to people who work and succeed in the electrical industry and we don’t recruit people out of automotive, healthcare or paper companies. The pool is additionally thinned by the housing market; relocations are very problematic for a household to move if their house is currently at a low equity or under water. The ability to sell the house and provide cash to buy into the new market, despite the lowered values is in many cases untenable. Job security for most companies has been seriously damaged by the deep recession and companies’ reactions to that through aggressive downsizing, so we’re at a unique confluence of competing challenges; employees are more open to leaving their current company, but they’re very limited in where they can go, geographically.

We’ve seen a significant increase in companies adding talent over the past 90-120 days. All of these positions are net-adds, not replacements. So the market has already shifted, the talent pool is poised to hearing options, but the creativity of those options will have to cater to the needs of the prospective new employee.

There is never a ‘perfect’ employee, just as there isn’t a perfect employer, yet employers are still functioning as if the talent pool is unlimited and they have the ability to design the perfect employee on an assembly line; complete with a life-time guarantee. That isn’t reality, the talent market right now is considering multiple offers, expecting significant flexibility in work/life balance and not anticipating finding their ‘last job’, but gaining experience and building a resume for the next challenge.

Hiring is now best perceived as an investment. Define the problem that needs to be solved, find the talent to solve that problem and ensure the return on investment is favorable; regardless of the tenure of employment, the compensation terms or the overall cultural ‘fit’. Hiring has become transactional, not relational.

Hiring processes have to adapt quickly as well. The days of 2-3 rounds of interviewing, reference checking, test regimens, credit checks, background checks and drug screens will leave most talented people feeling exploited and un-trusted. Every company will make occasional bad hires, but if the hiring process is viewed as an investment strategy, then the task will be to mitigate bad hires with quicker reviews and assessments of performance as part of the on-boarding process.

Reference checks are uniformly meritless, yet the habit persists due to legacy processing. Reference checks add legal and governmental risks, they inject opinions from people whose motivations we don’t know and they provide cursory information that is rarely predictive of future performance.

The next 5 years will be the onset of the War for Talent; as predicted in the early 90’s. Its arrival was predicted to occur as the Boomers begin to retire in ever increasing numbers, which begins this year and goes forward for 15 more years. Talent acquisition will strain relationships between senior management and human resource departments as headcount expense will grow disproportionately over the next several years. An investment model of talent acquisition will assuage most of that tension, if HR and IT can devise financial models of individual performance and impact on an earnings statement.

The next 5 years will bring significant growth, but only if the talent is available to support it. Employee retention programs should be implemented immediately and acquisition strategies should be refined to provide for faster decisions and less intrusion into the candidate’s life.

The Buzz-March 2011

 March 2011
Volume 12 Issue 3

Thin slicing
by Ted Konnerth

It’s a fascinating process to help client companies find key talent. It starts with the ‘needs analysis’; which is roughly akin to designing Superman. We’re advised that a degree is required; with a minimum accum. MBA highly preferred, they have to relocate, they have to be within a compensation range, must have a specific or minimum number of years of industry experience, they have to pass drug tests, psych tests, personality profile tests, have a clean driving record, no criminal record, have strong leadership skills, have experience managing a certain size of business, etc. Some clients even imply we should narrow it to a specific age band; which is of course, illegal and dismissed by us. 


Recruiting is a process of setting ‘filters’; every item listed above is another filter, which means the size of the talent pool has to be large enough to provide qualified candidates who survive all of the filters. Realistically, the talent pool and employee/employer relationships have changed since the ‘shopping’ days of the past. The sheer number of eligible bodies who can step into senior or management level positions right now are short by 10,000,000 between Baby Boomers and Gen X. Despite the Great Recession, there simply aren’t enough people to fill the growing openings of the departing Boomers; who have officially begun to retire. So why create a ‘job description’ that effectively eliminates most qualified candidates?

Let’s take the degree issue. Bill Gates and Michael Dell would take exception that a degree is required to succeed in business; even in a technology business. Degrees are conferred for completing course work, satisfactorily. Applying that course work to real life isn’t always a guaranteed success. Degrees are meaningful, but the task at hand should be to identify the problem or opportunity that lies ahead and find someone who has already solved that problem, even if he is a she with no degree.

The same logic follows for test regimens. Testing makes sense for specific skill sets: engineering, CAD, typing, finance, IT certifications, etc. Rejecting talent because they fell below an arbitrary qualification level on an internet-delivered test of 40 questions isn’t the magic bullet of hiring. Tests must be tested for long term success in the same industry and same functional position to be of any scientific merit. Statistical reliability that predicts performance of any manager or senior executive is unproven in the vast majority of tests. It’s a data point, at best. At worst, it’s a waste of potential talent and money.

Talent is an operating expense. There should be a measurable ROI for talent. That talent should be selected to ensure that the current tasks are completed to the level of expectation; which renders a positive ROI. The average tenure for a new employee right now is 34 months. The tenure of a new CEO is less than that. Let’s focus on attracting someone who can deliver a strong ROI in three years or less. If you’re able to create a retention program to keep them longer than 3 yrs, then you’re simply ahead of the game; keeping a contributing employee for longer tenure. Talent acquisition should begin with defining what the existing problems are and what solution sets you’d like to see and then devise a plan for attracting someone who has actually faced those problems before, successfully.

In short, creating barriers to entry is simply thin slicing; taking a dwindling talent supply and creating arbitrary filters to restrict the supply to fit a normative structure that is no longer in parity with the reality of today. Everyone wants to achieve perfect hiring, but people aren’t perfect, neither the hiring authority nor employee. And stark reality is that we no longer hire for ‘permanent’ positions. There aren’t gold watch ceremonies any more and not just because gold is above $1400. Trying to fit a restless population into a structured three-ring HR binder of job descriptions, coupled with a series of thin sliced ‘must have’ attributes is no longer a model for growing your business through strategic talent acquisition. 

Define your objective and recruit talent to achieve it. It should be as simple, and as hard as that.

Contact Us

Subscribe

Email Address:

© 2010 Egret Consulting. All rights reserved.